2015 Pushin’ the Deadline Gift Guide for the Lady Lawyer


Ok, it’s already into the second week of December and if you haven’t grabbed that gift for the lady lawyer on your list, I’m here to offer suggestions with the help of a few of my friends: lady lawyers from across the country.


I’m a self-confessed planner nut, so this category makes the number one slot on my list. Most lawyers use a paper calendaring system and an electronic calendar (aka our phones). It’s just safer. As a wise man once told me: “The only thing you can screw up that I can’t fix is a deadline.”

I’ve used an Erin Condren planner for the past year and I have one waiting for me under the Christmas tree. I’m excited about the changes I’ve seen made (horizontal layout, less text for more flexibility) and I love the goodies and extras that come with every planner.  Order a generic planner now and they will send you a gift card for a personalized cover–which means you can still get it under the tree in time!

And, they have changeable covers, which means you can get festive all year long. I’m loving this New Years’ Cover:

ec party started

My second choice would probably be either the Inkwell or Simplified planners and I’ve heard positive things about the Day Designer from lawyer friends as well.

Inkwell makes journals of all sorts, but the quarterly journal may be particularly appealing to ladies looking to trim the bulk in their bags.

Current special for quarter bundle: $35.00

inkwell quarterly

They are currently sold out, but I’m sure a gift card would be appreciated; plus, they’ve got other great stuff, like a planner stamp! This is fantastic (hint-use chalk ink in a planner to ensure no bleed through):

Stamp: $7.00

planner stamp


Yes, lawyers love these. There is no such thing as too many. You’d be surprised how many we can get through in a year. First up is Inkwell Press again, with my two favorite designs: “Life is either a daring adventure or nothing at all,” and the honeycomb print. They have graph paper inside, which comes particularly in handy when you are trying to chart out a fire location or point of shooting. We live charmed lives, don’t we?

Each journal:  $17.00


Mousepad and Headphones

She doesn’t have to live in an office that looks like it was decorated by Charles Dickens himself. Help her say, “umm, no,” to that mousepad her client corporation gave her and yes to something beautiful!

jamie blawg

Jamie K. in Dallas, a bankruptcy attorney, writes: “I enjoy things that make my office feel more ‘me’ since it’s where I spend a ridiculous amount of time. Examples include this beautiful watercolor mousepad:

watercolor purple mousepad

Mousepad is $12.00 from courtneyoquist on easy.com

Rachel V., an attorney in Chicago says:

“I definitely agree with Jamie on personalization! Also, when I was still in an office, a good pair of ear buds were my best friend. Also, I always kept a blanket and small pillow hidden away in my desk…just in case.”

If the lawyer on your list has been very, very nice this year, allow me to recommend my headphones:

bo headphones

These are the Bang & Olufsen Play headphones, which are seriously like a slice of heaven on earth, and available through Amazon Prime 2 day shipping for $367.96.


In the same thread, lawyers everywhere are looking to personalize that space they spend so much time in with unique art.

anne gift guide

Anne Milligan, a Portland-based labor law attorney, spends her day-dreaming minutes filling up a Pinterest board with art to buy for her office.

So far, she’s been very satisfied with her artwork from various artist, including Society6

cat with mouse

$16.00 for this print, which is currently in stock. You can’t go wrong.



Everyone in our focus group of 8 lawyers agreed that a business tiara would be a welcome addition to their desks. For $11.95, she can own the Benevolent Queen of the Enchanted Business Forest Tiara from Bullish and rule her own (small) kingdom.


There are tons of other goodies on that site that my friends definitely wouldn’t say no to, as you can imagine just by looking at that tiara.

Happy Gift Giving!

Let’s Catch Up!


Let’s Catch Up Real Quick

Heeeyyyy, oh my gosh, it’s been so long, I’ve been meaning to call! I’ve been so busy with the kids (2 kids ages 4 and 1) and shutting down my law firm.

Yes, shutting down a law firm is a lot of work. Like, way more work than setting one up. No one tells you that.

When I tell people that I decided to shut my firm down, most give me condolences akin to the death of a family member. To be sure, I felt like a failure when I decided to call it quits, but it had to happen for my sanity. But, at this point, I mostly just feel like jumping for joy.

Now that it’s not unusual for me to get at least 6 hours of sleep every night, I realize how terribly I was treating myself and I suffered and my family suffered because of it. I’m severely anemic and Vitamin D deficient, which already puts a crunch on my energy levels and I have a blood clotting disorder that doesn’t lend itself well to crazy stress. But…I’m a workaholic and can’t stop myself when I get started. Like, the bad kind of workaholic, not the interview kind. The kind that breaks up families, not the kind you joke about. In my old firm, I had protections built in for that. Every other attorney knew it was a real problem for me and if I was staying later than other people, a partner would double check that it was actually necessary. When I worked for myself, there was no check and no one else who knew what was actually necessary and what wasn’t.

I think, especially for a woman with two kiddos below kindergarten and an attorney spouse, running a law firm and managing the business side of a firm is just asking too much of yourself. Especially in a practice as high volume and stressful as bankruptcy (and I was also running PR interference for a case with national international media attention). I don’t really regret trying it, although I would say it would’ve been better had attempted it once both kids were older than kindergarten.

Anyhow, if you are seriously considering going out on your own, call me first and let’s chat.

Ok, tomorrow you should look for the 2015 Pushing the Deadline Holiday Gift Guide for Lady Lawyers!



The Time a Senior Partner Stood Up for an Associate and Changed the Course of American History

Well, that’s a dramatic title, isn’t it? But, it’s true.

In 1950, Joseph McCarthy, a lawyer, former judge, and a junior senator from Wisconsin, shot to prominence by claiming that he had a list of “members of the Communist Party and members of a spy ring” who were employed in the State Department.

He is famous for saying things like, “One communist on the faculty of one American University is one too many,” and “even if there is only one communist in the State Department, that would be one too many.” By the time he really got going, it wasn’t just important power figures who felt his wrath, but ordinary citizens who lost their livelihoods as a result of McCarthy’s finger-pointing witch-hunt. Despite the fact that he came in like a wrecking ball, he  was never able to prove his sensational charge.

But, in the few years succeeding his claim,  he became an all-American hero, despite his complete disregard for due process.

Not as widely known as McCarthy’s anti-Communist crusade were his various attempts to intimidate, and expel from government positions, persons whom he accused, or threatened to publicly accuse, of homosexuality. Former U.S. Senator Alan Simpson has written: “The so-called ‘Red Scare’  has been the main focus of most historians of that period of time. A lesser-known element…and one that harmed far more people was the witch-hunt McCarthy and others conducted against homosexuals.”This anti-homosexual witch-hunt that McCarthy and others waged alongside their “Red Scare” tactics has been referred to by some as the “Lavender Scare.”

In 1953, McCarthy decided to take on the military after his chief legal counsel, Roy Cohn, pressured him to. Cohn was unhappy because his friend (and a former junior staffers to McCarthy), David Schine, was called up for military service and was unable to get a cushy desk job in either the CIA or the Army, despite Cohn asking very nicely. That did not suit them.

Early in 1954, the U.S. Army accused McCarthy and  Cohn, of improperly pressuring the Army to give favorable treatment to Schine. McCarthy claimed that the accusation was made in  in retaliation. The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, usually chaired by McCarthy, was given the task of adjudicating these conflicting charges. The hearings convened on April 22, 1954 and lasted for 36 days. They were broadcast on live televsion, with an estimated 20 million viewers.

The most famous incident in the hearings was an exchange between McCarthy and the army’s chief legal representative, Joseph Welch. On June 9, Welch challenged Roy Cohn to provide USAG Herb Brownell, Jr. with McCarthy’s list of 130 Communists or subversives in defense plants “before the sun goes down”. McCarthy stepped in and said that if Welch was so concerned about persons aiding the Communist Party, he should check on a man in his Boston law office named Fred Fisher, who had once belonged to the National Lawyers Guild, which Brownell had called “the legal mouthpiece of the Communist Party.”

In an impassioned defense of Fisher, Welch responded.

Welch: “Until this moment, Senator, I think I have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks to be a brilliant career with us. Little did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel as to do an injury to that lad. It is true he is still with Hale and Dorr. It is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dorr. It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty I would do so. I like to think I am a gentle man but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.”

When McCarthy resumed his attack, Welch interrupted him:

“Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild. Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

McCarthy tried to ask Welch another question about Fisher, and Welch cut him off:

“Mr. McCarthy, I will not discuss this further with you. You have sat within six feet of me and could have asked me about Fred Fisher. You have seen fit to bring it out. And if there is a God in Heaven it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further.”

When McCarthy once again persisted, Welch cut him off and demanded the chairman “call the next witness.” At that point, the gallery erupted in applause and a recess was called.

The American people saw a callous bully in McCarthy and his public approval ratings plummetted. The hearings recessed for summer and never resumed. McCarthy was later censured and lost all influence. He became a very heavy drinker and drank himself to death.

Fisher went on to have a long and successful career as a lawyer, becoming a partner at Hale & Dorr and president of the Massachusetts Bar Association.

Baking a Law Firm from Scratch: How to Be Both a Chef and a Lawyer

As David Seders once hilariously recounted in Me Talk Pretty One Day, the word “chef,” in french, means “boss.” Because my law firm took on an associate very soon after I had started implementing it, I had to actually come up with title beyond “Attorney.” “Boss” doesn’t fit me (although I’m bossy, I think that title belongs to someone much older than me and in a much larger firm). I am very, very aware that the buck stops with me; that my associate is entitled to depend on my decision making when the ethical areas are gray; and that, ultimately, whether my law firm creation succeeds or flops is my responsibility. But “boss” just wasn’t it.

I decided to go with “Managing Attorney.” It has all the hallmarks of “person in charge” without sounding so stuffy. And it also has an verb before the noun that really says it all: “managing.”

Oh, how fast am figuring out how important that part of the title is. It is now my main job. I am attorney after I am managing, in both form and function. Whether or not I am doing that well is another story. I will be the first to admit that I am not perfect at it. I am learning it as I go. I am fortunate that my associate is not the type to hide her feelings, but provides real feedback about when I do something wrong and is my first cheerleader when I do something right (love you, LC). If I didn’t have someone who gave their honest opinions, I’m pretty sure we would be minus one associate by now.

You see, I’ve never been a manager before. I’ve helped managers. I’ve deposed managers. I’m rather familiar with the roles of Michael Scott and his British counterpart. But, I’m a lawyer, not a manager…at least until a couple of months ago. What do I manage? Here’s the partial list:

If I should hire someone.

Who to hire.

Compensation packages.

Advertising. Where do I even start?

Healthcare Plans and Dental Plans. Which plan? What is this marketplace tax thing?

Technology-which software? which hardware? where to buy? when to buy?

Bank accounts-two, one trust account designed to terrorize my few hours of sleep every night..how do I know which is the best bank?

Credit card processor-is the cheapest the best? Am I complying with the credit card companies directions? Am I going to get sued if I get hacked? How do I make this work with my trust account?

phone lines-landline, cell lines, VOIP, fax-which provider, which plan, prepay? Which hardware with this? How do I make this damn thing forward my calls?!

Filing system-How do I want to arrange my files physically?

Document management system? How do I want to arrange my files electronically?

Accountant-who should I hire? When should I hire?

Payroll-when do I need a payroll processor?

Parking-Where to park? How much is too much? Remember to send the check every month. Pray something better comes open soon.

and that’s just the job for the sous chef….

What Puts the “Grand” in “Grand Jury?”


There has been a lot of discussion about grand juries and what they do. What makes them so grand? Where do they come from? How are they different from your standard (or “petit”) jury?

Grand Juries were historically used in common law countries, such as England and the United States, to provide checks against prosecutorial overreach. In fact, they were initially used for all sorts of purposes, including basic government. Over time, however, their use has gradually declined, with the United States being the only country that still regularly uses them.

From Wikipedia: “A Grand Jury is a legal body that is empowered to conduct official proceedings to investigate potential criminal conduct and to determine whether criminal charges should be brought.”

In other words, the grand jury decides whether there is sufficient probable cause for the prosecutor to file charges against someone accused of a crime.

But what’s so grand about that? Well, while the petit jury you see in normal trials (or at least on Law & Order) is made up of 12 jurors, a federal grand jury has anywhere from 16 to 23 members. In order to bring a case in federal court, the prosecutor must have 12 of those jurors decide that there is sufficient evidence, or probable cause, to be tried. If they vote to do so, it’s called an indictment. (“in-DIGHT-ment”)

Why do they go through all this rigamarole? I thought the prosecutor just decided when to file charges? The requirement for a Grand Jury comes from the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. You may know that the Fifth Amendment is the basis for Miranda Rights, including the right to remain silent, but it also provides that “no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury…” So, in federal court, charges can’t be brought against someone until the Grand Jury has indicted.

So that’s how it works in federal court, but the cases that we’ve heard about recently have been in state courts, namely Missouri and New York. Do state courts have to use grand juries, too? Actually, no. In this instance, the Fifth Amendment requirement for Grand Juries hasn’t been held to apply to the States, meaning States are not required to use a Grand Jury to file an indictment. Only twenty-two states have laws allowing for the use of grand juries, and not all of them regularly use them. Many of those states only use them for felonies, or homicides, or other extreme cases. Many others don’t use them, even though they could.

Okay, so why go through the fuss of having two trials? Ah, don’t get confused here. Even though they’re a jury, the Grand Jury doesn’t meet in court. They are not actually held in courts, or with judges, or even with the defendant! Grand Juries are, generally speaking, only allowed to hear from the prosecution, from the witnesses the prosecution chooses to call, and they see only the evidence the prosecution wants them to see. There is no judge to rule on evidence, and there is no defense attorney (or defendant) there to dispute the evidence that the Prosecution presents. Needless to say, this lack of argument against the prosecution makes it incredibly easy for the prosecution to set forth its side. Because the Grand Jury hears nothing other than what the prosecution wants it to hear, indictments are almost guaranteed. When a prosecutor asks for an indictment, it’s generally given, which gives rise to the famous quote that “a Grand Jury would indict a ham sandwich.”

In addition to this, Grand Juries usually meet in secret, and any transcripts are sealed records, and the very fact that they have been called is usually not revealed. If Grand Juries were public, it would be even harder to get witnesses to come forward in the first place, especially if their testimony would serve no ultimate purpose if the person were not indicted.

The purpose of the Grand Jury is one more step in the checks and balances that we place on the government and the actions of the State. Just as the Founders provided that we can’t be compelled to testify against ourselves, they also didn’t want to give the State an unlimited ability to prosecute people for serious crimes. The Grand Jury is one (albeit small) hurdle for the State to clear along the way of trying a person for a crime. As stated above, it’s usually a done deal when a person is accused before a Grand Jury, but there are exceptions. The two prominent cases in the past weeks are proof.

*This was first posted on my firm blog at http://www.jwellslawfirm.com on December 8, 2014.*

Friday Funbag! Interview with Jennifer Wells (Yeah, That’s Me) About Starting a Firm from Scratch


I’m back. And I’m better, faster, stronger…OK, I’m actually sick and slightly behind on actual work projects due to this horrendous sinus stuff. BUT! Business is going well. Family seems happy enough. I’m ready to start blogging again.

I have some great interviews already lined up for the next few months.  but I decided to interview myself for my first post since my hiatus. I’ve had a crazy past couple of months and all I can say is how incredibly glad I am to have taken the plunge and opened my own firm. It feels a bit odd asking and answering my own questions, but…oh well, here we go!

Q: Tell us a little bit about your firm. 

A. It’s called Wells Law Firm, PLLC. We are in a historic building in downtown Little Rock, on Second St. We both work out of one room, which is getting a little crazy and we are already looking at expanding a little.  I have one associate, Leslie Copeland, who just passed the bar this fall, and zero staff (unless you count my friendly mailman and the poor receptionist next door). We do a fairly general practice. I handle just about everything except domestic relations, which is Leslie’s area. We don’t do EEOC or admiralty law. So far, those are my only areas that I am firmly saying “no” to.

inside wlf

Q: Did you always plan to have your own firm?

A: No. I have almost no business administration training, except for some accounting and a few college business classes. I like being a lawyer and doing legal work of starting a business (formation, dissolution, etc.), but the administrative part has never really appealed to me, so I thought I would always be with a firm. I ended up leaving my firm because there simply wasn’t enough flexibility in my schedule to accommodate my daughter’s new school schedule when she moved from daycare to a “real” school.

Q: What made you decide to have an associate?

A: At first, I thought I was going to be solo. I also did not want to do any domestic relations work. It soon became apparent to me that a brand new start up law firm would have to take domestic relations cases. They are the most frequent type of legal cases we get calls about. So, I found Leslie, who actually wanted to do DR work. She is one of those special people with a gift of knowing how to help families in emotional crises. I wasn’t born with that touch, so I let her handle that part of it. It’s paying off. I don’t have to turn DR clients away and I still don’t have to do it myself. I help Leslie with her cases when she has questions, but honestly, her clinic classes prepared her well. She usually knows what to do and her clients love her.

Q: What is the hardest part of starting a new firm? 

A: Honestly, there are two things that I think are difficult. One is learning to budget the money. The other is just figuring out all of the things it you have to do to start a business. We are finally getting there.

Q: How much were your start up costs? 

A. I have an interest free line of credit of $10,000, plus a $10,000 business credit card. I thought it would cost me a couple of thousand, maybe, to get started. I quickly discovered that it took closer to $9,000 (for two lawyers) just to get up and running. Now, I definitely could have done it cheaper than that. I like having good technology (good computers and printers) and good health insurance. That stuff costs more up front, but I think it pays off in the long run.

Q: What were some of your unexpected costs? 

A: I honestly never thought I would need a payroll company, but I learned that relying on a professional for wage withholding, etc. is definitely worth the price. I planned to handle my own bookkeeping (I have some accounting background), but doing that stuff means I wouldn’t have any time for legal work, which is how I make my money. I also didn’t realize how much malpractice insurance would cost. And we both joined ATLA, with is our trial lawyer association and paid for unlimited CLE passes. That stuff isn’t cheap, but it has been well-worth it.

Q: Where have you been able to save money? 

A: My website. My logo. I do all my own graphics work and I built my site through squarespace. It is much cheaper than paying to have it built. But, I have some graphics background and I love doing creative stuff. It isn’t for everyone. I don’t have a secretary or receptionist, but I have always done my own typing, etc.

This is an example of an advertising packet I did with materials from Office Depot:

ad packages

Q: Would you recommend starting a law firm right out of law school? 

A: No, I wouldn’t recommend it. I would do everything I could to avoid it, actually, but I understand that isn’t a possibility for everyone. I was lucky enough to have three years in a firm, 16 months clerking full-time for a judge, 6 law clerkships, and 4 years as a paralegal before I started my own firm. And it’s still a bit overwhelming, but that’s mainly the business side. The legal side isn’t the problem. I’m not afraid to admit what I don’t know, but at this point, I know who to call to find out what I need to know. If I were brand new, I would make sure I had several good mentors who were willing to spend the time and effort to mentor me from the ground up. Theoretically, you are ready to practice law when you get that bar license, but it’s so, so easy to commit malpractice without even knowing it! I love being an ATLA member for that reason. There are so many people willing to answer questions, night and day. It’s incredible.

Q: Which programs do you use?

A: We are an all mac office, which limits our choices (I think that’s a good thing). We currently use Rocket Matter, but also tested MyCase and liked it. I also use Google Drive, Evernote, and Dropbox. I love transcript pad and trial pad for iPad. I do my accounting stuff by hand right now: I use both paper sheets and an electronic sheet that I created for myself.

Q:What’s the best part of working for yourself? 

A: Deciding which cases I want to take and ordering my schedule the way I need to. I don’t work any less (probably more) but I do it at times that are more convenience for me. I also love the thrill I get every time I see my letterhead with my name on the top (it’s in bold dark pink, of course).

It’s Pro Bono Month! Here are the Events You Should Know About (Please Share!)


October is pro bono (latin: for free) month and my firm, Wells Law Firm, is partnering with Arkansas Legal Services, Center for Arkansas Legal Services, and the W. Harold Flowers Law Society on several events this month, which I have listed below. If you are an attorney and you’d like to volunteer, feel free to email me and I will get you the information: jennifer at jwellslawfirm.com.

October 22-Wills and Healthcare Forms for UAMS Rockefeller Cancer Institute. 


Teams of Arkansas lawyers, legal assistants, notaries public, and law students are needed to prepare simple wills, advance directives, and powers of attorney for health care and financial matters for cancer patients at UAMS. (I won’t be attending this one, but thought I should include it for anyone who qualifies

UAMS Rockefeller Cancer Institute patients can sign up online.

October 24-Expungement Clinic at Shorter College


Attorneys with the W. Harold Flowers Law Society are partnering with the Center for Arkansas Legal Services, Legal Aid of Arkansas, Arkansas Legal Services Partnership and Arkansas Access to Justice Commission to host an Expungement Clinic to provide free legal help to low-income  Arkansans and Shorter College students in preparing legal forms to seal criminal records.

Low-income Arkansans who want help can make an appointment online.

October 28-Wills and Healthcare Forms at Arkansas Children’s Hospital


Teams of Arkansas lawyers, legal assistants, notaries public, and law students are needed to prepare simple wills, advance directives, and powers of attorney for health care and financial matters for patients and their families at Children’s Hospital.

ACH patients and families can sign up online.

Dr. Benjamin Brandreth’s Universal Vegetable Pills

I recently went to my grandmother’s funeral in Vermont and I thought some of my grandmother’s family history would be interesting to legal readers.


Caroline “Joyce” Knepper was born to Ivan L. Stanton and Marion Ida Hunter on December 28, 1930.  Her first home was a cabin on Brandreth Lake. Eighteen months later, she became a big sister when her brother, Emlon, made his appearance. Her father, Ivan Stanton was an Adirondack guide and caretaker of the Brandreth family’s rural 30,000 acre retreat. Her mother, Marion Hunter, was a homemaker at the family’s Brandreth Lake home. When Joyce was growing up on Brandreth Lake, the only way to reach her house was by a train to Brandreth station, and then switching to station wagon for the long 7.5 mile trip down the unpaved road. In the winter, the family’s home  was only accessible on horseback or by sleigh.

Joyce was homeschooled by her mother at their kitchen table. On Sundays, they sat in the living room listening to a church service on the radio. Summers were spent swimming, boating, fishing, hiking and picnicking. She enjoyed picking blueberries and making homemade ice cream with ice that had been cut from the lake and stored in sawdust in the ice house. One of her fondest childhood memories was riding the railroad handcar to a fishing spot known as “St. Agnes’ Chapel.” In the winter, the family would ice fish and spent many long hours snowshoeing through the trails.

Rural living had its drawbacks, though. When Joyce was seven, her appendix ruptured. Her parents put a mattress in the station wagon and drove to the nearest train station, where they had to a take a train to get to the nearest hospital. The family moved to Worcester, Vermont soon after that, enabling the children to attend public school and have other children for friends for the first time. Later, my great-uncle Emlon would take over as caretaker and guide at Brandreth.

Here’s a little bit of history about the Brandreth Park, where my grandmother grew up:

Brandreth Park is the oldest family-owned forest preserve in the state of New York. Wikipedia entry here.


Dr.  BenjaminBrandreth was born in England and came to this country in 1835. He was the son-in-law of an English apothecary who developed and patented the first laxative pill, thereby creating the family’s fortune. In 1851 Dr. Benjamin Brandreth, having made a fortune with his “Brandreth’s Universal Vegetable Pills”, bought Township 39 in Hamilton County  of upstate New York, consisting of 24,000 acres (97 km2) in the Adirondacks  of New York State; he paid 15 cents an acre. In this manner he established “Brandreth Park,” the first private preserve in the future Adirondack Park.  Included on the property is 890-acre (3.6 km2) “Brandreth Lake.” Consequently, Hamilton County is one of the least densely populated counties in the eastern United State. The property is mountainous and heavily forested.

A joint venture between Thomas Allcock and Dr. Brandreth led to the development of the Allcock Porous Plaster company in Ossining, NY (known historically as the village of “Sing Sing”). The name of the firm eventually changed to Allcock Manufacturing. After Brandreth’s death, control of the firm eventually moved to his great-grandson, Fox Brandreth Conner, who began manufacturing animal traps along with pills and plasters. After a pause in production for World War II, production of the traps resumed and the Havahart brand became a registered trademark. Conner sold the pill and plaster business in the 1960s thus ending Brandreth’s medical legacy, but continued making the Havahart traps. In 1979 the Havahart trap business was sold to the Woodstream Corporation of Lititz, Pennsylvania, and the remaining property in Ossining was sold to Filex Steel Products Company. The remaining 34 employees in Ossining were offered jobs in Pennsylvania with the new owner, but many retired, thus ending the 142-year legacy of Brandreth’s enterprise


This undated photo is from my grandmother’s papers shows the plant in Sing Sing:


My great-grandfather once made breakfast for General Patton, who came to Brandreth Park to meet with Fox Conner. There is an interesting article here about Brandreth’s role in the war.


A building on Brandreth Lake, pictured above.

Here are some of photos from my family’s collection showing fun times at Brandreth:



I think this might actually be my great-grandfather, but it’s hard to tell with the hat on.

10390312_762724080439218_6335446318816924106_n 10363828_762732647105028_781650570304088496_n 10352598_762731697105123_7074539947715566435_n 10252045_762731977105095_5371625556352423080_n 1939508_762731710438455_4969871785691441694_n 10356026_762720377106255_7879041505273385834_n

Throughout its ownership by the Brandreth family, the property has been managed in a way to preserve as much as possible its native character. In order to preserve the property’s primitive character, all development is limited to the north end of Brandreth Lake, and no motor boats are allowed on the lake. The family anticipated the concept of cluster development which became popular in the 1990s by concentrating all building on the north side of the lake, thereby ensuring pristine views toward the south. Property owners, all descendants of Dr. Brandreth, need to apply to the building committee of the Brandreth Park Association before building.

The property was not logged for many years, as the family desired to maintain it in a primitive condition. However in 1911-1919, a softwood harvest was performed by the Mac-a-Mac Lumber Corporation, of which John N. McDonald and Benjamin Brandreth McAlpin, son of Gen. Edwin A. McAlpin, were principals. This first harvest was extensive, with between 30-35 railcars of spruce logs shipped daily to the St Regis Paper Company’s plant in Deferiet. Additionally, Mac-a-Mac was storing an additional 70 carloads of cut logs in ponds and lakes for later transport off the property. A second harvest took place in the mid-1920s. Since then the family has permitted occasional selective harvesting.

In the 1950s, the Brandreths sold 6,000 acres (24 km2) and donated an additional 9,000 acres (36 km2) to Syracuse University while retaining recreational usage rights in perpetuity. Around this time the family created the Brandreth Park Association to provide a vehicle for each family member to have a voice in the management of the property, and to help pay for taxes and other operating costs. In 1992, the Association enrolled the property under the New York State Forest Tax Law which provides for an 80% exemption from property taxes in exchange for a commitment to sustainable timber production. In 2007, some members of the family established a nonprofit organization known as the Shingle Shanty Preserve and Research Station in order to preserve and protect the land adjacent to present-day Brandreth Park, on which the family still retains recreational rights. This tract was last owned by the Nature Conservancy.  The Shingle Shanty Preserve and Research Station makes the Shingle Shanty property available to outside parties for research subject to permit.

So, now you know something you probably didn’t know before!